Mailbag: Is UFC 312 worth the pay-per-view price on Super Bowl weekend?

The audience has voiced their opinions and they are less than enthused about the UFC 312 lineup.

Is UFC 312 worth the investment for fans? Is Dricus du Plessis establishing himself as a dominant force in the middleweight division, or is there still room for improvement? Additionally, what actions would prompt the UFC to take a stand against a fighter engaging in inappropriate behavior outside the octagon?

All this and more are addressed in this week’s mailbag column. To submit your own question, reach out to @BenFowlkesMMA or @benfowlkes.bsky.social.

Your perspective is valid. It’s understandable why you might feel that way. However, it’s important to acknowledge Dricus du Plessis’ accomplishments.

Dricus has successfully defended his title, a feat Sean Strickland never achieved. He remains undefeated in the UFC and has finished four of his last five opponents. Despite any reservations, he has defeated top-tier fighters like Robert Whittaker and Israel Adesanya. It’s undeniable that he has earned his title and status through his performances.

While fans may still have doubts, it’s crucial to recognize his achievements and the challenges he has overcome. He can only compete against the opponents presented to him, and his record speaks for itself.

Indeed, times have changed.

It’s evident that the UFC’s priorities have shifted, especially considering the lackluster lineup for UFC 312. The organization’s focus on profitability and convenience may have led to a decline in the quality of fight cards, particularly on pay-per-view events.

Super Bowl weekend further complicates the situation, as fans may be more inclined to spend their money on other entertainment options. The lack of compelling matchups and star power on the card only exacerbates the issue.

When considering the value of UFC 312, Zhang Weili and Tatiana Suarez stand out as compelling reasons to tune in.

Zhang’s exceptional skills and well-rounded fighting style often go unnoticed, despite her dominance within the promotion. Similarly, Suarez’s resilience and journey to a title shot make her a captivating figure to watch. These fighters offer unique narratives and talent that elevate the overall viewing experience.

While the main event may not generate much excitement, the presence of these fighters adds depth and intrigue to the card. It’s essential to recognize and appreciate their contributions to the sport.

It’s evident that the UFC’s decision-making is primarily driven by financial considerations.

While the organization claims to support free speech, past actions have demonstrated a willingness to silence or penalize individuals for their words. The UFC’s focus on maintaining control and preserving its image often takes precedence over individual expression.

Ultimately, the UFC’s response to controversial statements or behaviors is dictated by their impact on the organization’s bottom line. External pressure from sponsors or broadcast partners may prompt changes in policy or decisions regarding fighter conduct.

Let’s not be too quick to judge Sergei Pavlovich’s recent performance.

Considering his previous losses, Pavlovich was in a precarious position and needed a victory to stay afloat in the promotion. It’s essential to acknowledge the pressure he was under and the importance of securing a win by any means necessary.

While the current heavyweight division may lack depth, it’s not an unprecedented situation.

Historically, the UFC has experienced fluctuations in the quality and depth of its heavyweight roster. Choices made by the organization, such as mishandling top talent like Francis Ngannou, have also contributed to the current state of the division.

The UFC’s approach to cultivating talent and managing weight classes is influenced by financial motives.

While there are efforts to develop fighters and maintain a steady stream of talent